The 91 is the RON rating (Research Octane Rating). This is used in countries other than the USA. It equivalates to our 87, which you see on our pumps.
The manual in the image above shows a RON rating of 95 and AKI of 91. This would be 91 octane in US terms.The 91 is the RON rating (Research Octane Rating). This is used in countries other than the USA. It equivalates to our 87, which you see on our pumps.
Yep, my manual is the same now that you mention it. I suppose it's better to just go with 91 octane?Interesting. I just looked at the maintenance section and I also have the conflicting 91 octane recommendation.
I told my significant other that we should probably put super in it once and a while just to clean things out. Otherwise putting 87 with a fuel additive like Costco sells would be fine for most of the time. Most engines are tuned to work with a wide range in quality of fuel. Your engine may suffer in fuel economy and power or worse, it could clog the fuel injectors if you constantly put poor quality fuel in it but fuel from a reputable place with an additive in it should be fine for the majority of time. If it were turbo charged, I would be more concerned. I guess we’ll see if there is more clarity from Kia at some point in the future.Yep, my manual is the same now that you mention it. I suppose it's better to just go with 91 octane?
I have a 2023 SX , 8K Miles. I always bought 89 gas , top tier. In town mileage was between 17.5-18.5 Last time I bought 91 just to see what happens. Van became significantly more responsive and in town mileage increased to 20.5 -21. Same drive mode , same routes. I'll try 94 in the future.
I don't care what "experts" , manuals beileve in and what is possible "technically" . When I switched to 93 my van immediatelly performed better , felt stronger , burned less gas. Same day , same season/ weather etc... . If you don't believe it , try it !!!Technically, there is no way this could happen if all of the variables were the same. That's just not how octane works. Temperature and winter vs summer blend is most likely the reason.
I'll take physics and chemistry over personal anecdotes every time. If higher octane truly offered better gas mileage and driving performance, then it would be in Kia's best interest to advertise this.I don't care what "experts" , manuals beileve in and what is possible "technically" . When I switched to 93 my van immediatelly performed better , felt stronger , burned less gas. Same day , same season/ weather etc... . If you don't believe it , try it !!!
Please don't - it would only help to perpetuate this myth about octane. I would much prefer the members of this community to put their money toward other areas. And since this is a family vehicle, that other area is probably diapers 😅Maybe we should start a fuel octane challenge?
I put jet fuel in my van and it has quadrupled the horsepower and I now get 45 mpg. I can now do burnouts down an entire city block and women are now asking me out on dates. Jetfuel is the only answer.Maybe we should start a fuel octane challenge?